Search This Blog

Friday, February 7, 2014

The World’s Smallest Electric Guitar Goes Platinum

Meet The Indian That Takes out Mitra 
Kana author of the vaiseskika sutra
 Miniature Guitar Photo by S Cash 02072014
The World’s Smallest Electric Guitar Goes Platinum

Not to be confused with the World’s Smallest Violin; however, both are about the size of your Forefinger and Thumb.


Not even Mitra a modern day Einstein can make a false proposition true!

We see a lot this credit hording especially in Texas, all one has to do is publish in Texas and the whole world will believe it even if it is not true. That is why many copyright works are highjacked and ISBN numbers are manipulated. I have several reports sent to the justice department concerning Copyright, Patient Thief, and Intellectual Property Thief that have lot more to do with just money and who said it first! 

Muska, Terry, PHD.  Introduction to Classic Guitar A Method for First Semester College Students. San Antonio: San Antonio College, 1972. 1. Print

The First publication of its kind regarding the classical guitar, Terry Muska Professor San Antonio College San Antonio Texas 1972.  Most Guitarist who have practiced the art have used Terry’s book in some form or another. 

The Rest Stroke [Arrest Stroke]: When a hand finger or thumb plays a string and comes to rest on the adjacent string

The Free Stroke [Free-bee Stroke]: When the thumb or a finger of the hand plays a string in a plucking manner.

Arpeggio: Broken Cord 

Cord: The sounding together of three or more tones

 “ In designing a building, the architect makes sure that its foundations is sufficiently solid to support the weight of the entire structure. Similarly, in learning to play the guitar the student must first establish the foundation of his technique. Only when his posture, his way of holding the instrument, position and action of both hands are correct will he find himself able to solve the progressive difficulties of his studies in a musically acceptable ways.” – Andres Segvia

Meet the Indian who took on Stephen Hawking
By Afrin Kankudti | February 7, 2014 4:41 AM PST

“Hawking's about-turn has vindicated Mitra. But, in retrospect, he feels sad about the treatment he got at home while trying to take on Hawking all by himself.” 

“Abhas Mitra, at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai, was perhaps the first and the only scientist who had the guts to openly challenge Hawking of Cambridge University who is regarded by many as the modern-day Einstein.”

“One logical resolution of this paradox would have been to realise that black holes did not exist. But Mitra says that such sweeping, yet logical thinking "was never undertaken by either party involved in this prolonged debate and they kept on debating effectively to make the paradox more popular and perpetuating.”

Tell me about it, Paul Kerpe set the World Back least a thousand years, and my self has never returned to the University of Study.  Just last month a publisher of a work that increased campus shootings by 100 fold called me and gave the good old Secret Service funeral insurance death threat; although, she has been profiting off the good name of the Secret Service for 10 years with no associations with them at all.

Paul Burton poetically describes ancient Sanskrit ontology as the “The Quest of the Overself” published in 1939. If heaven exists, and I argue that it necessarily exists, our own solar system must be nested within its heavenly properties.  In contemporary literature, we lose this association because our language now determines these concepts as “abstract ideas” such as the Philosopher A. Kripke writes, “A. Kripke-Plantinga (KP) world is an abstract object of some sort.” How can it be established that our solar systems, including Earth, spins in abstract space, an area that can only be appreciated intellectually? 

“The arguments of Kripke and Plantinga in defense of modality are pragmatically metaphysical (except insofar as they directly address Quine's linguistic argument). Both turn on the concept of a possible world. Leibniz was the first philosopher to use ‘possible world’ as a philosophical term of art, but Kripke's and Plantinga's use of the phrase is different from his. For Leibniz, a possible world was a possible creation: God's act of creation consists in his choosing one possible world among many to be the one world that he creates—the 'actual' world. For Kripke and Plantinga, however, a possible world is a possible “whole of reality.” For Leibniz, God and his actions “stand outside” all possible worlds. For Kripke and Plantinga, no being, not even God, could stand outside the whole system of possible worlds.”

As stated, “for Leibniz, a possible world is a possible creation: God’s act of creation consists in his choosing one possible world among many to be the one world that he creates- the 'actual' world” in which God is the lone situated knower of that world. The world Leibniz refers to is a conditional Biblical world illustrated in ancient text, afore mentioned. Under these biblical conditions, not even God could make a false proposition true; nor could Kripke or Plantinga presuppose a possible ‘whole of reality” by standing outside the whole system of possible worlds.

The Black hole theory is certainly true “Fall 2008 Financial Collapse” if it were not true then trillions of dollars and information would not have disappeared back to nothing and the FBI could solve the case! 

“Hawkins Story has been “Hawking's about-turn has vindicated Mitra. But, in retrospect, he feels sad about the treatment he got at home while trying to take on Hawking all by himself.” 

“Abhas Mitra, at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai, was perhaps the first and the only scientist who had the guts to openly challenge Hawking of Cambridge University who is regarded by many as the modern-day Einstein.”

“One logical resolution of this paradox would have been to realise that black holes did not exist. But Mitra says that such sweeping, yet logical thinking "was never undertaken by either party involved in this prolonged debate and they kept on debating effectively to make the paradox more popular and perpetuating.”

Logic, rationality, and even mathematics are imperfect sciences based on at least one exception to reason that lends the mind to a linear way of thinking or a popular belief in Linearism, a view point that life is a rigid time line controlled by known laws of physics excluding laws that lost by antiquity. 

Certainly, the closest I could describe my soul in a logical linear way would be- here now in a point in spacelessness. In other words, my being or the I-ness of my being is here now always. The perceiver or the I-ness of a being transcends the known laws of physics that applies to the temporal or things with beginnings and endings. That which is eternal has no beginning or end and is the higher legislative law that determines the law of physics of the natural order of things.

Shape and forms of things seem to be adaptive to the world which surrounds or affects a particular body. Certainly, this is true in a sense but not necessarily. Objects are conditioned by the physics of awareness, the higher law of perception in which all lower laws must obey. Critical thinking never help me much  in matters of the soul, maybe because deduction and logic is something new to the world and to me, a way to explain something eternal that is “Always Known Here Now.”

The latter Vedic Period of 300 BC to 600 B.C. is dominated by two philosophical views; the traditional Brahmin which deals with the embodiment of the unconditional self, and applied science, the birth of logic. The Upanishads migrate from the idea of a superior ruler of many gods to monism, a unified whole or universal self-termed ‘Atman’.  Logic developed from competing theories of physical proofs accredited to Kana author of the vaiseskika sutra (O’Dell).

“Abhas Mitra, at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai, was perhaps the first and the only scientist who had the guts to openly challenge Hawking of Cambridge University who is regarded by many as the modern-day Einstein.”

“One logical resolution of this paradox would have been to realise that black holes did not exist. But Mitra says that such sweeping, yet logical thinking "was never undertaken by either party involved in this prolonged debate and they kept on debating effectively to make the paradox more popular and perpetuating.”


Not even Mitra a modern day Einstein can make a false proposition true!

We see a lot this credit hording especially in Texas, all one has to do is publish in Texas and the whole world will believe it even if it is not true. That is why many copyright works are highjacked and ISBN numbers are manipulated. I have several reports sent to the justice department concerning Copyright, Patient Thief, and Intellectual Property Thief that have lot more to do with just money and who said it first! 

Examples: Hijacked ISBN Number

O'Dell, Gregory N. "The Best Possible World, All Possible Worlds:" Linearism.Org Advocacy for Human Rights. Nov. &Dec. 2008. Web.  06 Feb. 2010. <http://www.linearism.org/EssayOntology.html>.

O'Dell, Gregory N. "Me, What Makes Me Me The Nature Of Self." Linearism.Org Advocacy For Human Rights. 15 Oct. 2008. Web. 06 Feb. 2010. <http://www.linearism.org/EssayTheNatureOfSelf.html>.


No comments:

Post a Comment